Jamie is NOT a lock. First time nominees for best actor on average never win. He has a better chance for the supporting actor category. Scorcese should win best director pushing Eastwood for director to a possible Best Actor winner. All the old timers are due this year. I have been following the Oscars for years and the most deserved actors usually never win when old timers are involved. I hope whoever bet Foxx wins, but he is no lock.
Hey Royler, how bout best picture and director? I like Aviator and Scrocese in these category's. And thanks for the UFC action. Between you and a few other guys, I had 6 winners out of 6, and I don't know jack about the thing.
Not interested in playing favorites at any awards show...not when 3-1, 5-1, and 8-1 underdogs hit with regularity. Lazy handicapping, dude, though I hope you win.
I'm tempted by Virginia Madsen for Best Supporting at +300, but I'll stick with M$B as my only play of the night. If you're feeling really adventurous, look into John Williams winning Best Original Score for Harry Potter at +585. Best Sound Mixing should go to Ray at +150.
i wouldn't call it lazy.
i'd call it smart.
i did my research. checked out various critics picks.
9 out of 9 like swank, foxx, and freeman.
i've seen most of the nominees.
fwiw, all 9 liked Million dollar baby for best picture.
i probably will play 5 units on that as well.
watching aviator later today just to make sure.
director choice is a toss/up
It's entirely possible Scorcese will get Best Director (for the more technically challenging job) and M$B will get Best Picture (for the arguably better movie).
On sports talk radio here in southern california there is a show that they every year put on this guy who predicts the oscars. He picks every catorgory and is usually about 85% correct. he only missed 4 tonight... he hit all the major catorgories including make up and costume..... next year Ill post what he says...